scindu funding
All calls

FENX.05.07 Bezpieczeństwo morskie i śródlądowe drogi wodne poza TEN-T

FEnIKS · CUPT · National call

fenx-05-07-bezpieczenstwo-morskie-i-srodladowe-drogi-wodne-poza-ten-t-2

Summary

Not an R&D call a Polish company can use, by Scindu's rule.

Supports maritime safety and inland waterways outside TEN-T; eligible applicant types are unspecified.

Who can apply
Unclear from the source.
Amount
Budget not stated
Deadline
31 Dec 2026in 68 days
Status
Openopened 4 Jul 2025
Open the official pageRegister to keep this call

Machine-classified from the call text; check eligibility at the source.

Description

The description is on the provider's page.

Who can apply, in detail
Purpose
Energy, environment, infrastructure
R&D relevance
0 of 3
Poland eligible
Yes
Country limit
—
Region
Any
Consortium
Unclear
Readiness level (TRL)
—
Topics
  • Maritime safety
  • Inland waterways
  • Transport outside TEN-T

Machine-classified from the call text; check eligibility at the source. 23 Oct 2026

Conditions28

Typed facts extracted from the source documents by Scindu's grant-data review. Each value keeps its own conditions. Unknown means unstated, not zero or unlimited.

Applicant type
Państwowe Gospodarstwo Wodne Wody Polskie, a state legal person responsible for water-management tasks.
Application restriction
Infrastructure with expected life of at least5years triggers project-appropriate climate mitigation/adaptation verification under2021/C373/01. This is an assessment trigger, not a universal minimum project duration. The applicant must substantiate applicable climate resilience and DNSH requirements; infrastructure/asset characteristics determine the analysis scope.
Application restriction
Prepare an evidence list for all six DNSH environmental objectives across preparation, construction/implementation, operation and closure. This is a documentation duty throughout project life; a blank template is not proof that a proposed project complies.
Application restriction
Provide the applicable strategic/environmental assessment or justified screening/exemption, EIA report or nontechnical summary and consultation/decision records as appropriate; assess cumulative effects, avoid salami slicing, disclose administrative decision/appeal status and do not begin construction before an enforceable construction decision. The form is conditional; an EIA is not automatically required for every purchase.
Application restriction
Where relevant, the competent-authority Natura2000 declaration is accompanied by a project/Natura map; applicable water assessment conclusions or the competent-authority water information must substantiate no deterioration/obstruction of water objectives. Annex4 expressly allows justified non-infrastructure purchasing and certain vessel/telematics projects without physical adverse water effects to explain non-applicability rather than attach every form. This is a project-specific determination, not an automatic exemption for all ships or ports.
Application restriction
Climate analysis includes neutrality screening and justified escalation, location-specific exposure, asset sensitivity and combined vulnerability. Medium/high vulnerability requires detailed risk analysis unless the stated well-justified medium-risk internal-mechanism exception applies; significant risks need adaptation measures and monitoring.
Application restriction
WOD2021 only, Polish documentation, qualified signatures/authority documents; published window4July2025–31December2026 at23:59. Administrative/environmental decisions required for assessment must exist by the end of assessment subject to the rule’s suspension clause. See unresolved current-status conflict; this is not a live-acceptance claim.
Application restriction
Applicable declarations prohibit double funding, including the stated seven-year used-asset and ten-year property checks and total public coverage above 100% of the same eligible costs. They require five-year post-final-payment durability and, for non-SMEs, the stated ten-year/no-production-relocation-outside-EU obligation or applicable aid period. These are conditional asset/durability obligations, not project implementation duration or proof any applicant satisfies them.
Application restriction
The applicant must provide the applicable declarations and evidence securing its own share (including a financing gap) and all ineligible costs, accept responsibility for authorised entities’ expenses, keep separate accounts/codes, verify procurement and expenditure, permit audits and obtain the applicable authorisation before works. Infrastructure/production operation and maintenance financing must remain sustainable for the required durability period where that clause applies. Blank amounts are applicant-specific evidence, not advertised limits.
Application restriction
Submit the original applicant declaration signed with a qualified electronic signature confirming the WOD application. Attach authority-to-represent documents as original or qualified-signature-certified copy; the declaration exempts KRS and municipal election/oath authority evidence from copy certification. Blank signatures and names do not establish an applicant’s compliance.
Application restriction
Only projects previously identified by the Managing Authority as entitled to the noncompetitive selection route can be submitted.
Application restriction
A physically completed construction project or fully implemented supply/service project before application cannot receive support, regardless of whether all payments were made.
Application restriction
This evidence applies to inland-waterways procedure FENX.05.07-IP.02-001/25, not the separate maritime/SAR rounds with the same action label.
Eligible geography
The project must be outside the TEN-T network.
Eligible project scope
Linear and point investments on inland waterways: rebuilding hydrotechnical structures and regulation works and clearing the navigation fairway; intervention116, outside TEN-T.
Ineligible project scope
The generic form asks about legal derogation pathways, but its express FEnIKS footnote prohibits new river hydrotechnical infrastructure and projects requiring Water Framework Directive Article4(7) derogation. It cannot be used to override the exact inland call criteria prohibiting WFD4(7), Habitats6(4), higher waterway class and significant adverse impacts.
Ineligible project scope
No new hydrotechnical infrastructure on rivers, including regulation of free-flowing rivers, new barrages or reservoirs; no raising any inland-waterway operating component to a higher class than before the project. No derogations under Water Framework Directive Article4(7) or Habitats Directive Article6(4); no significant negative Natura2000/water-status impact.
Other condition
Current detail badge says applications ended/assessment in progress, while its published deadline and rule window remain31December2026. Preserve this conflict; no adjudicated closure, remaining balance or current acceptance is asserted.
Other condition
CUPT appoints the assessment commission and may seek external expert opinions; assessment corrections, impartiality/confidentiality, consensus and institution approvals follow the adopted KOP rules. Commission/expert positions belong to the assessment process, not funded beneficiary jobs. Any expert compensation is governed by CUPT’s individual contract; no public pay amount or applicant headcount is inferred.
Other condition
The assessment checklist distinguishes obligatory pass/fail criteria from point-ranked rows; a zero in a ranking row alone does not exclude the project, while the applicable combined minimum still governs. Blank committee names/roles are institutional sign-off fields, not beneficiary staff numbers or salaries.
Other condition
Where VAT is claimed eligible, declarations require legal non-recoverability and return of reimbursed VAT if recovery later becomes possible, including affected authorised entities. The form’s legacy two-year retention wording is retained as a source inconsistency, not a universal controlling retention rule; current applicable regulation, adopted agreement, aid/VAT and longer audit requirements must govern. Read conditional strike-out instructions and source hierarchy.
Other condition
Official linked optional withdrawal template names FENX.05.03 road action, while this call is FENX.05.07. Retain the actual source/URL; this is a template/action conflict, not evidence of corrupted capture. No initial-application eligibility or correct action adoption inferred; obtain the proper template if withdrawal is needed.
Other condition
Mark public communications, participant materials and project equipment/products with the adopted FE, Polish-colour (where applicable) and EU marks; publish project information and document activities. Total project cost above EUR 500,000 triggers a durable board; other projects need at least one A3 poster/equivalent display. Strategic projects or total cost above EUR 10 million require an event and invitations to EC/MA at least four weeks ahead. These are communication duties, not grant ceilings or fundable beneficiary headcounts.
Other condition
The adopted communications reduction table caps cumulative reductions at 3% of the grant: website 0.5%, social-media 0.5%, absent required markings 0.25%; missing board/poster 0.5%, wrong design 0.25%, poor visibility 0.25%; missing required event/invitations 0.5%. Apply the actual underlying duty and contractual correction procedure; these are potential grant reductions, not eligible cost rates or automatically imposed penalties.
Other condition
The agreement adopts ministerial guidelines applicable when the action/expense/procurement occurs, with the express more-favourable-edition exception and institution decision for reassessment. The retained19May2026 edition is not applied retroactively to every historic expense.
Other condition
Template provides advances and reimbursement, with subsequent advances conditional on at least70% of all previously transferred advance tranches being presented/approved for settlement (including unused amounts returned). Actual advance ceiling, settlement period and individual project amounts are blanks to be set in the agreement; no numeric funding cap or promised advance is inferred.
Other condition
Single-stage assessment requires all applicable obligatory horizontal/specific criteria and at least30% of the combined maximum ranking score, plus sufficient allocation. Specific criteria require alignment with the National Navigation Programme2030, immediate functional infrastructure, environmental safeguards, positive ENPV and required technical decisions. Ranking criteria are preferences, not blanket eligibility requirements.
Staff monthly hours, maximumActual-cost personnel: aggregate professional engagement across all EU projects and other sources/employers
276 hours_per_month

Aggregate276-hour test counts annual leave and sickness, excludes other absences as specified. Chapter3.8(17) excludes personnel under simplified methods from this chapter except integrity rule13, so this ceiling is NOT asserted for staff settled in the2% simplified indirect-cost pool.

Amounts and costs15
Advance settlement before next payment, minimumAll previously paid advance tranches, including returned unused amounts, underNPJBroute
70 %

Gate before a subsequent advance, not a guaranteed advance amount or loan-principal repayment rate. Only the NPJB agreement route; no import to PJB state-budget-unit settlement.

Call allocationEU/ERDF pool for exact FENX.05.07-IP.02-001/25 procedure
PLN 424,750,000

Published original call allocation, not a per-project cap or remaining balance. Rules allow changes; final allocation at agreement signing depends on EUR/PLN exchange rate.

Eligible cost
Necessary actual-cost project personnel may be eligible under the adopted cost guidelines: gross salary plus statutory employer costs, documented project duties and proportionate project engagement. EFRR/FS/FST salary cost must not exceed comparable beneficiary positions/qualifications. This does not turn the indirect2% pool into individually reimbursed payroll.
Eligible cost
The call-level eligibility period is1January2021–31December2029; the individual agreement specifies its project period. Costs outside the individual period are not eligible.
Eligible cost
Within the call-specific indirect flat rate: project coordinator and administrative management/settlement/monitoring staff remuneration, travel and training; management/HR/finance/legal/accounting support; necessary external services, expert advice and legal/financial/technical consulting. These cost categories do not advertise vacancies, require new hiring, or set headcounts, FTEs or salaries.
Eligible cost
VAT is conditional: under the retained2026 guidance a total-cost including-VAT threshold of EUR5m distinguishes the regimes; at/above it, VAT requires no legal recovery right and prescribed declarations. The authority can exclude VAT; the template contains alternative clauses, so no unconditional VAT eligibility is asserted.
Funding intensity, maximumAll public national/EU financing of the SAME eligible costs of the project or defined project part
100 %

No overfinancing or double funding: an eligible item must not have been, be, or become financed above100% in aggregate, and the applicant/other entity must not seek nonrepayable assistance above100% for the same eligible scope. Independent of the programme/EU contribution and aid intensity, which may be lower; not entitlement to100% programme funding. Exact declaration, award and source hierarchy govern.

Funding intensity, maximumEU funding divided by eligible project expenditure
85 %

Maximum EU component only; separate total public cofinancing ceiling is100%.

Funding intensity, maximumEU plus national public cofinancing divided by eligible project expenditure
100 %

Maximum total public cofinancing, subject to actual agreement possibly setting a lower ceiling. Not a claim of100% EU funding.

Indirect cost flat rateIndirect-cost flat-rate ceiling/base in this exact call: qualifying direct project costs
2 %

Call sets indirect costs at a2% flat rate of eligible direct project costs, eligible from1January2021; this is the specified simplified indirect budget, not2% salary reimbursement, the generic7% catalogue ceiling, or a grant intensity.

Ineligible cost
Unrelated representation costs are ineligible. Promotional gadgets are permitted only as supporting elements of another activity. Indicative promotion budgets, timing and communication-output targets in the form serve monitoring; they are not actual awards or project result targets. Material changes need the institution’s consent and cannot substantially impair communication.
Ineligible cost
Indirect costs charged again as direct costs are ineligible; classify the administrative/personnel/service items under the adopted catalogue, not as a separate actual-cost payroll entitlement.
Ineligible cost
Under the applicable actual-cost guidance: jubilee awards, employee severance, PFRON payments and employee ZFŚS benefits are excluded; nonmandatory employee contributions/fees require the stated6-month preapplication, equal-coverage remuneration-rule exception. Engaging an existing employee by a civil-law contract other than specific-work contract is excluded except statutory employment restrictions or R&D; operational-phase staff costs require the explicit approved-project exception.
Selection ranking threshold, minimumCombined applicable horizontal and specific maximum ranking score
30 %

Minimum combined ranking threshold; not percentage of one criterion, not funding intensity, and not a physical requirement. All applicable obligatory criteria must separately pass.

VAT regime threshold on total project costTotal project cost including eligible/ineligible costs andVAT
€5,000,000

At/above threshold triggers legal-recoverability test/declarations under relevant edition; authority may excludeVAT. Not grant/project-cost ceiling or actual programme total value. Apply state-aid and final agreement restrictions where relevant.

Personnel and services2

  • Necessary services listed in the indirect-cost catalogue; this is a service budget category, not employment eligibility or a job advertisement.

    Other role · Service the grant can fund

    Subject to necessity and indirect flat-rate classification; no price, headcount, FTE or required degree is asserted.

  • Cost category expressly present in the adopted indirect-cost catalogue. Settled through the call-specific simplified indirect flat rate, not an advertised vacancy or individual salary reimbursement.

    Project management · Staff cost the grant can fund

    No required headcount/FTE, hiring obligation, qualification degree or numeric salary is published. The simplified-method Chapter3.8(17) exception must be respected.

Source documents15
Call facts
Opens
4 Jul 2025
Provider
FEnIKS · CUPT
Source
cupt.gov.pl
Checked
24 Oct 2026
Review status
Partial review
Independent QA
No published hold
Reviewed
23 Oct 2026

This is a summary of the source page, not the official text. Eligibility, conditions and the submission system are at the source.