FENX.05.02 Porty morskie w TEN-T
FEnIKS · CUPT · National call
Summary
Not an R&D call a Polish company can use, by Scindu's rule.
Supports seaports within TEN-T; eligible applicant types are unspecified.
- Who can apply
- Unclear from the source.
- Amount
- Budget not stated
- Deadline
- 31 Dec 2026in 68 days
- Status
- Openopened 20 Jan 2026
Machine-classified from the call text; check eligibility at the source.
Description
The description is on the provider's page.
Who can apply, in detail
- Purpose
- Energy, environment, infrastructure
- R&D relevance
- 0 of 3
- Poland eligible
- Yes
- Country limit
- —
- Region
- Any
- Consortium
- Unclear
- Readiness level (TRL)
- —
- Topics
- Seaports
- TEN-T transport infrastructure
Machine-classified from the call text; check eligibility at the source. 23 Oct 2026
Conditions
Typed facts extracted from the source documents by Scindu's grant-data review. Each value keeps its own conditions. Unknown means unstated, not zero or unlimited.
- Applicant type
- Maritime port managers in the exact noncompetitive procedure.
- Application restriction
- WOD2021 only, Polish/qualified signature and authority evidence;20January2026–31December2026 23:59. Required environmental decisions covering full scope must exist by APPLICATION; other administrative documents by INTAKE END subject to specified exceptions. These earlier timing requirements differ from no-aid roads/SAR assessment-end rules.
- Application restriction
- Applicable declarations prohibit double funding, including the stated seven-year used-asset and ten-year property checks and total public coverage above 100% of the same eligible costs. They require five-year post-final-payment durability and, for non-SMEs, the stated ten-year/no-production-relocation-outside-EU obligation or applicable aid period. These are conditional asset/durability obligations, not project implementation duration or proof any applicant satisfies them.
- Application restriction
- The applicant must provide the applicable declarations and evidence securing its own share (including a financing gap) and all ineligible costs, accept responsibility for authorised entities’ expenses, keep separate accounts/codes, verify procurement and expenditure, permit audits and obtain the applicable authorisation before works. Infrastructure/production operation and maintenance financing must remain sustainable for the required durability period where that clause applies. Blank amounts are applicant-specific evidence, not advertised limits.
- Application restriction
- Submit the original applicant declaration signed with a qualified electronic signature confirming the WOD application. Attach authority-to-represent documents as original or qualified-signature-certified copy; the declaration exempts KRS and municipal election/oath authority evidence from copy certification. Blank signatures and names do not establish an applicant’s compliance.
- Application restriction
- The current information workbook requires applicant/partner identity, size, ownership/control links (including indirect and common-person links), economic/distress and recovery-order declarations, project cost/location/date information and previous aid for the same undertaking/costs. Financial statements accompany it as required. Generic rows for agriculture, wage subsidies, training, regional aid and legacy aid codes are conditional form context; they do not make those activities eligible under this maritime-port call. Actual eligibility and aid headroom remain declaration-dependent.
- Application restriction
- Project-specific environmental assessment/Natura/water evidence, infrastructure>=5-year climate-proofing trigger, whole-scope lifecycle DNSH evidence and climate risk/adaptation analysis apply. Specific forms can be inapplicable with justification for nonphysical scope; generic form derogation questions do not override programme exclusions. DNSH monitor designation is suggested, not mandatory new hiring.
- Application restriction
- Exact FENX.05.02-IP.02-001/25 regulation was published20January2026. Prior IZ identification is required for this noncompetitive route.
- Application restriction
- GBER4(1)(ee) exemption threshold concerns eligible project COST: EUR143m or EUR165m for a maritime-port project in the specified core-corridor work plan. Dredging project aggregates all works in one calendar year. These are notification/exemption boundaries, not advertised grant amounts;56b(5) category limits refer back to them.
- Application restriction
- Aid application must precede start of works/activities under GBER6. The exact call starts eligible expenditure the day AFTER aid application and ends31December2029; do not apply generic1January2021 retroactive eligibility from no-aid rounds. Aid/evidence/cumulation tests are project-specific.
- Application restriction
- Immediate functionality, positive ENPV, no directly commercial superstructure (warehouses/handling equipment), environmental/zero-emission/decarbonisation solutions unless justified technical impossibility, EU Sustainable Blue Economy alignment, coordinated common port investment strategy and Polish ports2030 programme identification; required environmental decisions as applicable.
- Application restriction
- A physically completed construction project or fully implemented supply/service project before application cannot receive support, regardless of whether all payments were made.
- Eligible geography
- Less-developed regional category, maritime port in coreTEN-T under the adopted criteria; their comprehensive-network exception is for sea-access projects and does not automatically expand this round scope.
- Eligible project scope
- Port quays/piers, maritime terminals excluding intermodal terminals, port basins/fairways/turning basins, internal road/rail networks, ship waste/sewage reception and environmental/zero-emission/decarbonisation measures; land-side road/rail access improvements. The generic criteria also discuss sea-side access, but the exact regulation lists port infrastructure and land access, not every generic5.2 type.
- Other condition
- Unlike no-aid roads/SAR rounds, port support is state aid under GBER56b. Aid cannot exceed eligible investment/dredging costs minus operating profit, using reasonable ex-ante projections or clawback. Category/tier ceilings and permitted regional uplift also apply; final award may be lower. Template100% payment-source split is not100% aid intensity.
- Other condition
- The adopted manual requires fixed templates, subordinate additional logos, no contractor marks in the main logo line, visible durable boards, and at least two boards for linear projects. A project begun before award must place its board within two months of agreement/decision; posters within one month of award. Create a social profile if absent and publish the required project/financing information. Maintain ordinary web/social information through implementation and a project-funded website through durability; apply the public-safety exception for poster location.
- Other condition
- CUPT appoints the assessment commission and may seek external expert opinions; assessment corrections, impartiality/confidentiality, consensus and institution approvals follow the adopted KOP rules. Commission/expert positions belong to the assessment process, not funded beneficiary jobs. Any expert compensation is governed by CUPT’s individual contract; no public pay amount or applicant headcount is inferred.
- Other condition
- The assessment checklist distinguishes obligatory pass/fail criteria from point-ranked rows; a zero in a ranking row alone does not exclude the project, while the applicable combined minimum still governs. Blank committee names/roles are institutional sign-off fields, not beneficiary staff numbers or salaries.
- Other condition
- Where VAT is claimed eligible, declarations require legal non-recoverability and return of reimbursed VAT if recovery later becomes possible, including affected authorised entities. The form’s legacy two-year retention wording is retained as a source inconsistency, not a universal controlling retention rule; current applicable regulation, adopted agreement, aid/VAT and longer audit requirements must govern. Read conditional strike-out instructions and source hierarchy.
- Other condition
- Official linked optional withdrawal template names FENX.04.01 core TEN-T roads, while this call is FENX.05.02 ports. Retain the actual source/URL; this is a template/action conflict, not evidence of corrupted capture. No initial-application eligibility or correct action adoption inferred; obtain the proper template if withdrawal is needed.
- Other condition
- Mark public communications, participant materials and project equipment/products with the adopted FE, Polish-colour (where applicable) and EU marks; publish project information and document activities. Total project cost above EUR 500,000 triggers a durable board; other projects need at least one A3 poster/equivalent display. Strategic projects or total cost above EUR 10 million require an event and invitations to EC/MA at least four weeks ahead. These are communication duties, not grant ceilings or fundable beneficiary headcounts.
- Other condition
- The adopted communications reduction table caps cumulative reductions at 3% of the grant: website 0.5%, social-media 0.5%, absent required markings 0.25%; missing board/poster 0.5%, wrong design 0.25%, poor visibility 0.25%; missing required event/invitations 0.5%. Apply the actual underlying duty and contractual correction procedure; these are potential grant reductions, not eligible cost rates or automatically imposed penalties.
- Other condition
- Aid-financed port infrastructure must be offered to users on equal/nondiscriminatory market terms; concessions or third-party construction/operation/rental awards follow competitive transparent unconditional nondiscriminatory procedures. Hydrogen/ammonia/methanol infrastructure has2035 renewable-fuel commitments and connected onsite renewable capacity is limited to linked charging/refuelling capacity.
- Other condition
- The agreement adopts ministerial guidelines applicable when the action/expense/procurement occurs, with the express more-favourable-edition exception and institution decision for reassessment. The retained19May2026 edition is not applied retroactively to every historic expense.
- Other condition
- Exact NPJB state-aid agreement supports advances/reimbursement; subsequent advances require settling70% of all earlier tranches including returned unused funds. Payment depends on funds and performance security. Individual grant amount, disbursement limit, settlement period and aid intensity are blanks.100%payment/0%national-dotacja entries identify source composition within approved support, not100%project funding.
- Other condition
- GBER56b(6) allows the80%/60% base ceilings to rise10 percentagepoints in Article107(3)(a) assisted areas or5points in107(3)(c) areas. This is conditional on the applicable aid-area qualification, not a blanket uplift from a broad programme regional label.
- Other condition
- Minimum30% combined horizontal/specific maximum points plus all applicable obligatory criteria/allocation. Specific grid total17: support goals up to8 (4environmental,4seaaccess,3landaccess,3infrastructure, capped8); readiness up to5 with5/4/3/2/1 mutually exclusive tiers; complementarity up to4 across four1-point branches.50%/100%land-rights readiness tiers are preferences, not universal eligibility.
- Staff monthly hours, maximumOnly eligible actual-cost personnel; aggregate professional engagement across all EU projects/other sources/employers
- 276 hours_per_month
Necessary direct investment/planning cost eligibility must first be established; not blanket staffing entitlement. Simplified-method chapter3.8(17) exception respected; this exact call excludes indirect costs.
- Staff restriction
- The call expressly excludes indirect expenditure, so administrative/project-management salary categories in the generic indirect-cost catalogue do not become fundable here. Any claimed direct personnel must be necessary within the actual GBER-eligible investment/planning cost scope and applicable cost-guide requirements, not a vacancy or guaranteed salary. The agreement requires SL2021 personnel engagement records.
Amounts and costs
- Advance settlement before next payment, minimumAll previously paid advance tranches, including returned unused amounts, underNPJBroute
- 70 %
Gate before a subsequent advance, not a guaranteed advance amount or loan-principal repayment rate. Only the NPJB agreement route; no import to PJB state-budget-unit settlement.
- Call allocationEU/ERDF allocation exact5.02-001/25 port round
- PLN 300,067,300
Published original pool, not per-project cap or remaining balance; change/EURPLN at signing possible.
- Eligible cost
- GBER56b permits infrastructure/access/dredging planning and investment costs; qualifying clean charging/fuelling infrastructure has its specific additional-cost definition. Nontransport industrial production, offices/shops and port superstructure are excluded. Fossil-fuel ship refuelling infrastructure is excluded. The exact call also excludes intermodal terminals, indirect costs and contingency reserves.
- Eligible cost
- VAT subject to adopted ministerial guidance§3.5, state-aid eligibility and final agreement alternatives; no unconditional VAT award is asserted.
- Funding intensity, maximumAll public national/EU financing of the SAME eligible costs of the project or defined project part
- 100 %
No overfinancing or double funding: an eligible item must not have been, be, or become financed above100% in aggregate, and the applicant/other entity must not seek nonrepayable assistance above100% for the same eligible scope. Independent of the programme/EU contribution and aid intensity, which may be lower; not entitlement to100% programme funding. Exact declaration, award and source hierarchy govern.
- Funding intensity, maximumGBER56b(2)(b)/(c) access infrastructure/dredging within4(1)(ee) threshold; aid divided by eligible category costs
- 100 %
Not automatic award or EU component. Funding-gap rule applies to ordinary56b(4)–(6) method;56b(9) is expressly alternative. Final call/contract/aid decision and cumulation govern.
- Funding intensity, maximumGBER56b(2)(a) port infrastructure, eligible project costs>EUR55m up to56b/4(1)(ee) threshold; base ceiling before permitted regional uplift; aid divided by eligible category costs
- 60 %
Not automatic award or EU component. Funding-gap rule applies to ordinary56b(4)–(6) method;56b(9) is expressly alternative. Final call/contract/aid decision and cumulation govern.
- Funding intensity, maximumGBER56b(2)(a) port infrastructure, eligible project costs>EUR22m and<=EUR55m; base ceiling before permitted regional uplift; aid divided by eligible category costs
- 80 %
Not automatic award or EU component. Funding-gap rule applies to ordinary56b(4)–(6) method;56b(9) is expressly alternative. Final call/contract/aid decision and cumulation govern.
- Ineligible cost
- Unrelated representation costs are ineligible. Promotional gadgets are permitted only as supporting elements of another activity. Indicative promotion budgets, timing and communication-output targets in the form serve monitoring; they are not actual awards or project result targets. Material changes need the institution’s consent and cannot substantially impair communication.
- Ineligible cost
- Under the applicable actual-cost guidance: jubilee awards, employee severance, PFRON payments and employee ZFŚS benefits are excluded; nonmandatory employee contributions/fees require the stated6-month preapplication, equal-coverage remuneration-rule exception. Engaging an existing employee by a civil-law contract other than specific-work contract is excluded except statutory employment restrictions or R&D; operational-phase staff costs require the explicit approved-project exception.
- Selection ranking threshold, minimumCombined applicable horizontal and specific maximum ranking score
- 30 %
Minimum combined ranking threshold; not percentage of one criterion, not funding intensity, and not a physical requirement. All applicable obligatory criteria must separately pass.
- VAT regime threshold on total project costTotal project cost including eligible/ineligible costs andVAT
- €5,000,000
At/above threshold triggers legal-recoverability test/declarations under relevant edition; authority may excludeVAT. Not grant/project-cost ceiling or actual programme total value. Apply state-aid and final agreement restrictions where relevant.
Source documents
- Zał. nr 6 do Regulaminu_ Wzór umowy NPJB_odstępstwa/FENX.05.02_UoD_Transport_NPJB_odstępstwa (002).docx
- Zał. nr 4 do Regulaminu/Zał. nr 4.9 do WOD Analiza klimatyczna 20.10.2026.docx
- zal-nr-7-do-regulaminu-_oswiadczenie-wnioskodawcy-wniosek-o-dofinansowanie-fenx_219.pdf
- zal-nr-8-do-regulaminu-_wzor-oswiadczenia-wnioskodawcy-o-wycofaniu-wniosku-fenx_215.pdf
- zal-nr-10-_dzialania-informacyjno-promocyjne_682.doc
- zal-nr-9-do-regulaminu-klauzula-informacyjna-feniks_700.pdf
- zal-nr-1-do-regulaminu-_-regulamin-pracy-kop_po-bp_618.docx
- zal-nr-6-do-instrukcji-wod_formularz-informacji_101.xlsx
- zal-nr-8-do-instrukcji-uzytkownika-aplikacji-wod2021_-formularz-oswiadczen_775.docx
- zal-nr-5-do-regulaminu_wzor-listy-sprawdzajacej_new_647.docx
- Exact current CUPT detail and attachment-version labels
- EUR-Lex consolidated GBER01July2023, including displayed2025 corrigenda; selectedmetadata and Articles4,6,8,56b
- zal-nr-3a-do-regulaminu_metodyka-i-kryteria-horyzontalne_948.pdf
- Ministry 2021–2027 expenditure eligibility guidelines, current retained 19 May 2026 text
- zal-nr-3b-do-regulaminu_5-2-morska-infrastruktura_703.pdf
- regulamin_fenx-05-02_713.docx
- zal-nr-2-do-regulaminu-_-wod2021_instrukcja-uzytkownika_wnioskodawca_v_1-24-fenx_850.docx
Call facts
- Opens
- 20 Jan 2026
- Provider
- FEnIKS · CUPT
- Source
- cupt.gov.pl
- Checked
- 24 Oct 2026
- Review status
- Partial review
- Independent QA
- No published hold
- Reviewed
- 23 Oct 2026
This is a summary of the source page, not the official text. Eligibility, conditions and the submission system are at the source.