scindu funding
All calls

5.7 Bezpieczeństwo morskie i śródlądowe drogi wodne poza TEN‐T - bezpieczeństwo morskie dla SAR

FEnIKS · National call

5.7

Summary

Not an R&D call a Polish company can use, by Scindu's rule.

Supports maritime safety for SAR under a measure covering maritime safety and inland waterways outside TEN-T; eligible applicants are unspecified.

Who can apply
Unclear from the source.
Amount
PLN 471,880,000Catalogue budget
Deadline
31 Dec 2026in 68 days
Status
Openopened 1 Oct 2024
Open the official pageRegister to keep this call

Machine-classified from the call text; check eligibility at the source.

Description

The description is on the provider's page.

Who can apply, in detail
Purpose
Deployment and investment
R&D relevance
0 of 3
Poland eligible
Yes
Country limit
Poland
Region
Any
Consortium
Unclear
Readiness level (TRL)
—
Topics
  • Maritime safety
  • Search and rescue
  • Inland waterways outside TEN-T

Machine-classified from the call text; check eligibility at the source. 23 Oct 2026

Conditions30

Typed facts extracted from the source documents by Scindu's grant-data review. Each value keeps its own conditions. Unknown means unstated, not zero or unlimited.

Applicant type
Morska Służba Poszukiwania i Ratownictwa (SAR), a state budget unit under the maritime minister.
Application restriction
Infrastructure with expected life of at least5years triggers project-appropriate climate mitigation/adaptation verification under2021/C373/01. This is an assessment trigger, not a universal minimum project duration. The applicant must substantiate applicable climate resilience and DNSH requirements; infrastructure/asset characteristics determine the analysis scope.
Application restriction
Prepare an evidence list for all six DNSH environmental objectives across preparation, construction/implementation, operation and closure. This is a documentation duty throughout project life; a blank template is not proof that a proposed project complies.
Application restriction
Provide the applicable strategic/environmental assessment or justified screening/exemption, EIA report or nontechnical summary and consultation/decision records as appropriate; assess cumulative effects, avoid salami slicing, disclose administrative decision/appeal status and do not begin construction before an enforceable construction decision. The form is conditional; an EIA is not automatically required for every purchase.
Application restriction
Where relevant, the competent-authority Natura2000 declaration is accompanied by a project/Natura map; applicable water assessment conclusions or the competent-authority water information must substantiate no deterioration/obstruction of water objectives. Annex4 expressly allows justified non-infrastructure purchasing and certain vessel/telematics projects without physical adverse water effects to explain non-applicability rather than attach every form. This is a project-specific determination, not an automatic exemption for all ships or ports.
Application restriction
WOD2021 electronic application, qualified signatures and Polish documentation. Published window1October2024–31December2026 at23:59; required administrative decisions must be issued by the end of assessment, subject to specified rule exceptions. Current application-system acceptance and remaining allocation are not verified.
Application restriction
Project communication must identify EU support in public materials and on purchased equipment; publish a short project description online/social media and document promotion. Total project costs above EUR500000 trigger a permanent information board; smaller projects require at least an A3 poster or equivalent display. Strategic projects or total costs above EUR10million trigger a communication event with Commission/Managing Authority invitations at least four weeks in advance. These thresholds trigger publicity duties and are not award limits.
Application restriction
PJB template requires updated or confirmed project schedule twice yearly (31March and30September, within7days) and records of project personnel engagement in SL2021. Personnel registration is an administrative obligation, not a published vacancy or minimum hiring count.
Application restriction
Only projects previously identified by the Managing Authority as entitled to the noncompetitive selection route can be submitted.
Application restriction
A physically completed construction project or fully implemented supply/service project before application cannot receive support, regardless of whether all payments were made.
Application restriction
Exact maritime SAR procedure FENX.05.07-IP.02-001/24; not inland001/25 or port-authority001/26.
Application restriction
The applicant must provide the original qualified-signed declaration that the WOD2021 submission is its application, with representation documents where required. The linked declarations require secured project financing, own/ineligible-cost coverage, resources for operation and maintenance, no double financing, and an identifiable accounting system/code. Blank figures are applicant inputs, not fixed own-contribution rates or salary conditions.
Eligible geography
The procedure concerns the less-developed category of region; maritime public-safety/environmental tasks cover the Polish maritime territory, Baltic EEZ and Polish SAR responsibility zone as stated for the sole applicant.
Eligible project scope
Maritime safety: equipping maritime rescue/navigation-safety services, including construction/modernisation of specialist vessels; construction/modernisation of communication, navigation and navigational-marking systems. Two project types have separate specific scoring grids.
Ineligible project scope
The generic Annex4 legal-derogation questions do not grant eligibility: its express FEnIKS footnote excludes new river hydrotechnical infrastructure and investments requiring Water Framework Directive Article4(7) derogation. Apply exact project-specific maritime and horizontal criteria; the form alone does not certify eligibility.
Other conditionExact linked annex templates
All five PJB workbooks were read including hidden sheets/cell validation. SL2021 payment/personnel files are blank imports; dropdown years2023–2030 and personnel date validation2021–2030-07-31 are template choices, not call eligibility dates. Implementation schedule has stale2007–2010 labels; paper payment schedule is expressly not filled by PJB and only requested for other cases, with current+next2years+future aggregate as planning horizon. Project-description sheet has blank scope/costs and a5year asset-use field from final payment, distinct from agreement durability after final-claim approval. VAT and bank-account declarations are blank conditional statements, not actual tax/account/financing facts.

No sample amount, formula error, stale year or dropdown is treated as an applicant value or new call rule.

Other conditionOfficial package publication gaps
End-of-rule annex list identifies1–10 correctly, while body references several annex numbers inconsistently. Exact owner page publishes13 attachment links but omits institution checklist Annex6; no checklist from another call is substituted. Linked withdrawal template names FENX05.03 roads despite SAR05.07 owner linkage. Retain this published mismatch without changing call identity. KOP committee/expert forms concern institutional assessment and create no applicant job/pay requirement.

Missing checklist limits confirmation of that assessment instrument. Other incorporated external guidance/legislation is not claimed fully reviewed.

Other conditionExact SAR application and selection process
Noncompetitive identified project requires all obligatory criteria, minimum combined ranking score and budget availability. Assessment normally120 calendar days from receipt, with IZ-approved60-day extension and specified excluded/suspended periods. Aggregate correction time up to60days is excluded; excess counts. Contract normally within60days of positive-assessment notification, with30-day shortened or90-day extended routes and objective exceptional delay beyond150days. Readiness documents within14days of demand; strategic information within7days.

No live submission, selected project score or executed agreement observed.

Other condition
The agreement adopts ministerial guidelines applicable when the action/expense/procurement occurs, with the express more-favourable-edition exception and institution decision for reassessment. The retained19May2026 edition is not applied retroactively to every historic expense.
Other conditionAll20pages current horizontal criteria and complete ranking matrix
Horizontal ranking contains11 rows: six additive1point environmental branches; education1; BalticStrategy2; foreigncooperation2/1/1 noncumulative; strategic3; designatedcity/marginalizationOSI3; EasternPoland/Silesia1; territorialstrategy2/1 noncumulative; extraEU-rate reduction>=1pp gives1; NEB1; crosssectorpartnership1. All are conditional preferences, not automatic SAR project features; extraownfunding criterion excludes cases where it requires extraStatebudget. Extra planting must survive>=5years. Obligatory horizontal criteria1–22 require legal/programme conformity, completeness, eligibility, financial sustainability, procurement readiness, environment/DNSH/climate, rights/accessibility and nondiscrimination; nonapplicability only where allowed.

Actual project/score unknown; project-specific statutory applicability remains. Do not add optional points without evidence or convert score thresholds into staff requirements.

Other condition
The linked state-budget-unit (PJB) agreement provides100% eligible-expenditure coverage, with final amount and national/EU split left blank, institutional approval of incurred eligible costs and SL2021 payment statements.
Other condition
The PJB agreement requires safe retention for five years from31December of the final-payment-approval year, with longer specified exceptions and possible suspension. The older application declaration has a different two-year formulation; it is not silently substituted for the contract obligation.
Other condition
The PJB template requires the final payment claim within30days after the project eligibility period, output indicators in that claim, and result indicators normally within12months after eligibility ends, with written institutional extension possible. Project durability is five years after final-payment approval, subject to any stricter applicable State-aid rule; breach produces a proportionate financial correction. This is not a project-duration minimum.
Other conditionConditional PJB agreement implementation
PJB model covers100% eligible expenditure; actual total, grant and national/EU split are blank. Initial SL2021 schedule is due within3workingdays of access/agreement; update or confirm twiceyearly at31March/30September plus7days and immediately for relevant changes. Payment verification normally60days, corrections14days, with restart/exception rules. Reporting still required without spend; claim cadence refers to external Zalecenia and no quarterly cadence or generic beneficiary advance/security terms are inferred. Final claim30days after individual eligibility end.

Public model and blank generic workbook fields do not establish an advance entitlement, selected amount or actual financing facts.

Other conditionConditional communication duty and grant-reduction mechanics
Model publicity requires marks, equipment stickers and online/social information, with a social profile created if absent. Board/poster/event branches depend on project characteristics and total cost; >EUR5m event notice14days differs from strategic/>EUR10m event and>=4week invitation. Exact six-row grid has ten deficiency branches (0.5% or0.25%) capped3%grant after cure process. Handbook includes150character title,<=4logos/line,80x40/120x60/240x120cm board formats,>=2boards for linear investments,2month preaward-started board and1month poster installation; no actual selected format is known.

Not monetary eligibility caps or project technical specifications. Handbook exactlinked10-page edition retained, no newer unrelated edition substituted.

Other conditionPJB conditional implementation and control duties
Full model includes project-cost>=PLN10m documented fraud risk analysis, separate works-contract>=PLN10m integrity clauses for procurements initiated after the funding agreement,7day conflict notification and30day reporting-information mechanism. Conditional environment review90days, Natura5km opinion branch and DNSH demand response<=14days remain subject to blank project-specific delivery/cure fields and applicable decisions. External control/audit results/proceedings notified7days; evaluation cooperation5years from programme closure.

No source10m condition is an advance-security threshold. Published blank project choices and statutory applicability remain unresolved.

Other condition
This exact SAR noncompetitive procedure states that State aid does not occur. The general aid/VAT alternatives in shared forms do not change this call-specific condition.
Other condition
All applicable obligatory horizontal and maritime-specific criteria must pass; minimum30% of combined maximum horizontal/specific ranking points and available allocation. Infrastructure/product must be functional immediately after investment. Vessel/equipment grid maximum8 points differs from communication/navigation grid maximum10; preference tiers are not mandatory applicant thresholds.
Other conditionConditional two project-subtype criteria
Rescue-vessel/equipment specific grid: mandatory functionality; readiness max3 noncumulative (procurement documents/value coverage>=50%=3,30–<50%=2,20–<30%=1), improvement max5 additive applicable SAR effects; total8. Communication/navigation/marking grid: functionality mandatory; readiness max6 noncumulative across six works/permit/procurement/land stages, plus improvement2navigation+2safety; total10. These totals exclude horizontal ranking points; minimum30% applies to combined maxima.

Actual submitted subtype and score unknown; optional preferences are not mandatory eligibility thresholds or project staffing requirements.

Staff monthly hours, maximumActual-cost personnel: aggregate professional engagement across all EU projects and other sources/employers
276 hours_per_month

Aggregate276-hour test counts annual leave and sickness, excludes other absences as specified. Chapter3.8(17) excludes personnel under simplified methods from this chapter except integrity rule13, so this ceiling is NOT asserted for staff settled in the2% simplified indirect-cost pool.

Amounts and costs14
Catalogue budget
PLN 471,880,000

Figure as listed by the provider. Whether it is the total allocation or a per-project cap is unverified unless a reviewed condition says so.

Call allocationERDF/EU allocation for SAR maritime procedure001/24
PLN 471,878,000

Published call allocation, not a per-project award or available remaining balance. Final allocation at signing depends on EUR/PLN; rule allows changes.

Call allocationOfficial monthly schedule row9 for the exact SAR procedure, displayed in PLN millions to two decimal places
PLN 471,880,000

Monthly display471.88million; exact call documents state471878000PLN. Not a separate funding pot, project award, or remaining balance.

Eligible cost
Necessary actual-cost project personnel may be eligible under the adopted cost guidelines: gross salary plus statutory employer costs, documented project duties and proportionate project engagement. EFRR/FS/FST salary cost must not exceed comparable beneficiary positions/qualifications. This does not turn the indirect2% pool into individually reimbursed payroll.
Eligible cost
The call-level eligibility period is1January2021–31December2029; the individual agreement specifies its project period. Costs outside the individual period are not eligible.
Eligible cost
Within the call-specific indirect flat rate: project coordinator and administrative management/settlement/monitoring staff remuneration, travel and training; management/HR/finance/legal/accounting support; necessary external services, expert advice and legal/financial/technical consulting. These cost categories do not advertise vacancies, require new hiring, or set headcounts, FTEs or salaries.
Eligible cost
VAT is conditional: under the retained2026 guidance a total-cost including-VAT threshold of EUR5m distinguishes the regimes; at/above it, VAT requires no legal recovery right and prescribed declarations. The authority can exclude VAT; the template contains alternative clauses, so no unconditional VAT eligibility is asserted.
Funding intensity, maximumEU funding divided by eligible project expenditure
85 %

Maximum EU component only; separate total public cofinancing ceiling is100%.

Funding intensity, maximumEU plus national public cofinancing divided by eligible project expenditure
100 %

Maximum total public cofinancing, subject to actual agreement possibly setting a lower ceiling. Not a claim of100% EU funding.

Indirect cost flat rateExact SAR001/24 call indirect-cost flat rate applied to eligible direct project costs
2 %

2% of eligible direct project costs under exact regulation§2(9)–(11); adopted indirect catalogue applies and double direct/indirect charging is excluded. This is not a salary or grant intensity.

Ineligible cost
Indirect costs charged again as direct costs are ineligible; classify the administrative/personnel/service items under the adopted catalogue, not as a separate actual-cost payroll entitlement.
Ineligible cost
Under the applicable actual-cost guidance: jubilee awards, employee severance, PFRON payments and employee ZFŚS benefits are excluded; nonmandatory employee contributions/fees require the stated6-month preapplication, equal-coverage remuneration-rule exception. Engaging an existing employee by a civil-law contract other than specific-work contract is excluded except statutory employment restrictions or R&D; operational-phase staff costs require the explicit approved-project exception.
Ineligible cost
Representation expenditure that cannot be clearly linked to project promotion is ineligible. Promotional gadgets are only a supporting element of other activities; the source does not impose a blanket monetary promotion cap.
Selection ranking threshold, minimumMinimum share of combined maximum horizontal and maritime-specific ranking points for exact SAR001/24 selection
30 %

At least30% of the combined maximum ranking points; all applicable obligatory criteria and available allocation also required. This is not30points, a funding rate, or a cost share.

VAT regime threshold on total project costTotal project cost including eligible and ineligible expenditure and VAT, for applicable2026 VAT eligibility regime
€5,000,000

At or aboveEUR5million including VAT, legal inability to recover VAT is required under the cited regime; authority exclusions and declarations still apply. Applicable guideline edition follows the expense-date/version rules. Not an award or eligible-cost cap.

Personnel and services2

  • Necessary services listed in the indirect-cost catalogue; this is a service budget category, not employment eligibility or a job advertisement.

    Other role · Service the grant can fund

    Subject to necessity and indirect flat-rate classification; no price, headcount, FTE or required degree is asserted.

  • Cost category expressly present in the adopted indirect-cost catalogue. Settled through the call-specific simplified indirect flat rate, not an advertised vacancy or individual salary reimbursement.

    Project management · Staff cost the grant can fund

    No required headcount/FTE, hiring obligation, qualification degree or numeric salary is published. The simplified-method Chapter3.8(17) exception must be respected.

Source documents16
Call facts
Opens
1 Oct 2024
Provider
FEnIKS
Source
cupt.gov.pl
Checked
24 Oct 2026
Review status
Partial review
Independent QA
No published hold
Reviewed
24 Oct 2026

This is a summary of the source page, not the official text. Eligibility, conditions and the submission system are at the source.