scindu funding
All calls

Jednorazowe publikacje propagujące ochronę środowiska i gospodarkę wodną

WFOŚiGW Katowice · National call

EE 5.2.

Summary

Not an R&D call a Polish company can use, by Scindu's rule.

Supports one-off publications promoting environmental protection and water management; eligible applicants are not specified.

Who can apply
Unclear from the source.
Amount
Budget not stated
Deadline
No deadline
Status
Open
Open the official pageRegister to keep this call

Machine-classified from the call text; check eligibility at the source.

Description

The description is on the provider's page.

Who can apply, in detail
Purpose
Training and people
R&D relevance
0 of 3
Poland eligible
Yes
Country limit
Poland
Region
Any
Consortium
Unclear
Readiness level (TRL)
—
Topics
  • Environmental awareness
  • Water management
  • Educational publications

Machine-classified from the call text; check eligibility at the source. 23 Oct 2026

Conditions22

Typed facts extracted from the source documents by Scindu's grant-data review. Each value keeps its own conditions. Unknown means unstated, not zero or unlimited.

Applicant restrictionSpecific EE5.2 regulation; controls over broad catalogue categories.
State budgetary units are excluded from this regulation.
Applicant typeExact EE5.2 route and 2026 regulation
Route page names specialized ecological-education entities (public/private entities, foundations, associations). The exact operative regulation excludes state budgetary units; public status alone does not remove that exclusion.
Application restrictionExact EE5.2 route and 2026 regulation
The Board decides after complete application assessment; submission is not equivalent to grant award, and awarded grant may be below the requested amount. No appeal is available under this regulation.
Application restrictionCurrent route, operative regulation and exact local row v27.
The current route and operative regulation describe continuous intake; no fixed opening or closing date is published in the route snapshot. The local row status is open as of the exact v27 snapshot, but that does not guarantee funds remain.
Application restrictionExact EE5.2 route and 2026 regulation
For a film application, §4 requires the comprehensive education programme, film concept and duration, screenplay, production-cost calculation, and intended use (broadcast/distribution).
Application restrictionOperative EE5.2 Regulation 881/2026 §5; selection criteria differ by publication or film task.
Film applications are evaluated on substantive merit, dissemination method (including potential distributor agreement), use, maker professionalism/track record, production costs, and other financing.
Application restrictionExact EE5.2 route and 2026 regulation
Formal attachments include a physical-financial schedule in the Portal template; proof/declaration of own funds obtained from other sources; representation authority documents; and legal-status documents for applicants other than JST.
Application restrictionOperative EE5.2 Regulation 881/2026 §5; selection criteria differ by publication or film task.
Formal selection requires consistency with the annual priority list and correct current form/format, completeness and signature, all required fields/attachments, consistency of purpose/type with the regulation, task not finished before filing, and requested instrument/amount/intensity consistent with the call.
Application restrictionExact EE5.2 route and 2026 regulation
During review, one supplementation of submitted documentation may be made on Fund request within 10 calendar days of receiving it; late documents are not considered.
Application restrictionExact EE5.2 route and 2026 regulation
Applications are submitted electronically through the Beneficiary Portal using an electronic signature with legal effect equivalent to a handwritten signature. If the applicant cannot apply that signature, the Portal accepts a handwritten-signed scanned form. Only complete applications with required attachments are assessed.
Application restrictionExact EE5.2 route and 2026 regulation
For a book/album/publication application, §4 requires a comprehensive ecological-education programme showing why the publication is needed; a concept/design with technical parameters (print run, format, volume, colour, etc.); a distribution list; and disclosure of free distribution or planned sales quantity, price, and whether revenues are in the financing plan.
Application restrictionOperative EE5.2 Regulation 881/2026 §5; selection criteria differ by publication or film task.
Publication applications are evaluated on substantive merit (including comprehensive ecological-education programme and publication design/concept), applicant experience in ecological education, print run, distribution method, implementation costs, and other financing.
Eligible project scopeExact EE5.2 route and 2026 regulation
Eligible project types described in the operative regulation are environmental-protection books/albums/publications (not children/youth textbooks) and environmental films, each as part of a comprehensive ecological-education programme.
Eligible project scopeAnnual priority classification only.
The annual priority lists classify EE5.2 as one-off publications promoting environmental protection and water management. Classification only; specific current conditions come from the 2026 operative call regulation.
Eligible project scopeExact EE5.2 route and 2026 regulation
This is a grant (dotacja) call for environmental-education publishing activity. It supports books/albums/publications directly related to environmental protection, excluding textbooks for children and youth, and environmental films; both must form part of a comprehensive environmental-education programme.
Eligible project scopeExact EE5.2 route and 2026 regulation
The call selects and finances environmental-education tasks promoting protection of the natural environment; its publishing activity supports ecological education.
Other conditionCatalogue metadata qualification only.
The normalized row’s category tags are not used to broaden the route applicant prose or override the operative state-budget-unit exclusion.
Other conditionExact EE5.2 route and 2026 regulation
On matters not covered by the EE5.2 regulation, the rules and selection criteria current on the application date apply. The 80% maximum is thus also subject to the applicable general rules and Fund capacity.
Other conditionRecommended effect indicators/verification only; operative regulation and grant contract control.
The linked 2026 effects guidance’s EE5.2 row recommends recording publication copies, film minutes and copies as physical outputs, with ecological-awareness increase among audiences as the ecological effect; it indicates sample publications/films and a narrative completion report as evidence.
Other conditionNo personnel compensation or hiring commitment inferred; overall cost category differs from Fund-payable sublist.
The regulation recognizes personnel costs in the overall project cost definition up to 5%, including volunteer work, but sets no job titles, headcount, hiring plan, salary or hourly pay. Further, the separate §2(2) Fund-payable cost list does not enumerate personnel costs.
Other conditionExact route, operative regulation and current local row.
The exact route, regulation and v27 row do not state a call allocation, remaining balance, fixed PLN award maximum, or fixed opening/deadline dates; continuous intake is not evidence of remaining funds.
Other conditionSeparate overall project eligible costs from the narrower enumerated costs payable from Fund support.
Author honoraria, editorial work, graphic design, reviews, distribution, personnel and promotional activities appear in §2(1) overall eligible task cost categories, but are not enumerated in the Fund-payable §2(2) list. The regulation therefore does not establish that the grant reimburses them.
Amounts and costs6
Eligible costSpecific costs that §2(2) says Fund financing may cover; external-service condition preserved.
Fund support may be allocated to external technical film-production costs, such as production, directing, editing, sound, and duplication on electronic media.
Eligible costSpecific costs that §2(2) says Fund financing may cover; external-service condition preserved.
Fund support may be allocated to external technical publication costs: technical preparation for print, print and materials, binding services, technical preparation of electronic publication, and duplication on electronic media.
Eligible costOverall task eligible-cost definition, not a representation that personnel or promotion are grant-funded under §2(2).
The regulation describes necessary task costs including external technical publication/film production, author honoraria/editorial/design/reviews, distribution, personnel costs up to 5% of task cost (including volunteer work), and promotional activities up to 10% of task cost. These are task-level eligible cost classes and do not by themselves establish which costs the Fund grant may pay.
Eligible cost limitExact EE5.2 regulation; project cost budget category only.
5 percent of total task cost

Overall eligible-cost category; §2(2) separately limits costs payable from Fund support to enumerated external technical cost categories. Not a payroll promise.

Eligible cost limitExact EE5.2 route and 2026 regulation
10 percent of total task cost

Overall eligible-cost category, not specifically among §2(2) Fund-financed cost lines.

Funding intensity, maximumExact EE5.2 route and 2026 regulation
80 percent of eligible costs

Maximum grant intensity; funding remains subject to ecological effects and Fund financial capacity.

Source documents8
Call facts
Opens
—
Provider
WFOŚiGW Katowice
Source
wfosigw.katowice.pl
Checked
24 Oct 2026
Review status
Partial review
Independent QA
No published hold
Reviewed
24 Oct 2026

This is a summary of the source page, not the official text. Eligibility, conditions and the submission system are at the source.