Find funding calls in Grant Radar, prepare the application with potential partner references, and follow internal approvals in one place. Track the funding decision and hand an awarded grant into a project.
Someone still needs to review the fit, bring the right expertise together, prepare the request, and coordinate institutional decisions. Scindu connects the funding source to the work that follows it.
Follow the people, decisions and records
from the first input to a useful result.
A researcher spots a promising call in Grant Radar. The research office needs the actual source, requested scope and institutional decision in one application trail.
Principal investigator · institutional approversA selected funding call, research scope and requested amount
Choose a call in the configured catalogue connection. Keep its source reference, revision and deadline with the request. Review whether the project, institution and partners fit the programme.
A native application with traceable funding-source context.
A catalogue limit is not the requested or awarded amount. The funder’s eligibility and submission requirements still need to be checked.
Continue from an award into project workThe website, data, and research processes are scoped together during implementation. These are the concrete pieces behind this part of the platform.
See the complete university offerStart from a Grant Radar call and carry its source details into the institutional application. The catalogue’s maximum support stays distinct from the amount you request.
Keep eligibility, consortium conditions, and the project’s actual scope in view. A relevant call is a starting point for review, not a funding commitment.
Use an explicit research topic to search UNITE and save potential partner references alongside the application. Confirm collaboration separately.
Route the application through the institution’s reviewed process. Keep forms, revisions, decisions, and responsibilities close to the same request.
Record submission evidence and the actual funding outcome. A reviewed award has its own amount and evidence before it is handed into project work.
Create or confirm a linked project after award review. Carry the approved funding context forward without recreating the application in a second lifecycle.
Proposed additions to the roadmap.
These are planned, rather than current features.
An actionable checklist of eligibility questions, required evidence, partner contributions, and application blockers.
Identify missing disciplines and partner roles, then coordinate interest, consent, and confirmed participation.
Give authorised research-office staff a cross-project view of opportunities, submissions, decisions, and bottlenecks.
Software and implementation are free for universities. We agree the rollout, institutional responsibilities, and research-data scope before onboarding.
Review your current content, people, processes, and institutional structure.
Configure the identity, records, access, and workflows agreed for your unit.
Introduce the next processes and units once the initial scope is working.