Give staff one place for project records, purchase and travel requests, approvals and progress reports. Keep each request with its research and funding context, so the next decision does not get lost in email.
A funded project brings purchases, travel, publications, approvals, and reporting. Connect these processes to the project so its history doesn’t disappear across forms and inboxes.
Follow the people, decisions and records
from the first input to a useful result.
A reporting deadline arrives while work is still underway. Keep the progress account, source context and reviewer decision with the project lifecycle.
Project lead · institutional reviewerProject progress, completed work, issues and relevant output references
Open the project and linked grant workflow. Review the reporting period, research activities and outputs so the update reflects the work that actually happened.
The evidence and context needed to write the update.
Researchers author and review the report. Automatically assembled evidence-backed report packs are a planned addition, not the current reporting workflow.
Connect approved publications and outputsThe website, data, and research processes are scoped together during implementation. These are the concrete pieces behind this part of the platform.
See the complete university offerCarry a reviewed award into the existing institutional project record. Keep its funder, project relationships, and related grant accessible to authorised people.
Bring planned research activity and supporting tasks into the institution’s workspace. Make the next action and the person responsible visible.
Prepare a purchase request with its specification, justification, funding source, and attachments. Retain the review decision and the next administrative step.
Connect research travel to its purpose, itinerary, costs, funding sources, and approvals. Keep a readable summary available to the people reviewing it.
Link publication planning and the actual approved output to the research. Public publication remains an explicit editorial decision.
Keep quarterly reports and final review in the grant lifecycle, with the project connection and decision trail available as the work develops.
Proposed additions to the roadmap.
These are planned, rather than current features.
Assemble editable report drafts from approved progress updates, publications, and activity records, with links back to the evidence.
Connect project allocations, partner contributions, commitments, and effort estimates beyond the existing funding-source register.
A permissioned view across project milestones, reporting deadlines, and stalled approvals for the teams overseeing delivery.
Software and implementation are free for universities. We agree the rollout, institutional responsibilities, and research-data scope before onboarding.
Review your current content, people, processes, and institutional structure.
Configure the identity, records, access, and workflows agreed for your unit.
Introduce the next processes and units once the initial scope is working.