Get a website for your department, faculty or research centre, with people, publications, projects, news and events. We configure and implement it. Your researchers submit updates; your editors approve what goes public.
Researchers know when their biography, project or publication needs an update. They can prepare it themselves. Editors review and publish it, using the same people and research records across the website.
Follow the people, decisions and records
from the first input to a useful result.
A researcher joins your materials group. Their profile should explain their work, belong to the right unit, and be easy to keep current.
Researcher · institutional editorBiography, affiliation, research interests and profile links
Write a biography, describe current research interests, and add the relevant identifiers and links. Preview the profile before asking for publication.
A profile update ready for editorial review.
Public-profile visibility and workspace membership are separate decisions. Publishing a biography grants no project access.
Connect publications and research recordsThe website, data, and research processes are scoped together during implementation. These are the concrete pieces behind this part of the platform.
See the complete university offerYour name, branding, language, contacts, and institutional context shape the site. Start with a focused unit and agree the wider structure as you expand.
Make expertise easier to understand through researcher profiles and research-group pages. Connect the person to their publications, projects, teaching, and affiliations.
Give a project space for its actual question, team, work, and outputs. Keep formal funding details available without making them the whole story.
News, events, study programmes, and courses belong alongside the research. Editors manage structured content in the same workspace.
Researchers can contribute the information they know best. Review and visibility controls determine what reaches the public site.
Help a visitor find expertise or a relevant research group, then give them a clear route to discuss a collaboration.
Proposed additions to the roadmap.
These are planned, rather than current features.
Spot stale profiles, missing project summaries, and broken output links before a visitor does.
Give several departments shared publishing patterns while preserving their own identity and editorial responsibility.
Software and implementation are free for universities. We agree the rollout, institutional responsibilities, and research-data scope before onboarding.
Review your current content, people, processes, and institutional structure.
Configure the identity, records, access, and workflows agreed for your unit.
Introduce the next processes and units once the initial scope is working.