For universities/The complete platform
THE FULL PICTURE

The university platform,
in detail.

A university website is only the beginning. Explore the connected workspace behind it: your people, their research, the next opportunity, and everything it takes to deliver.

Explore the complete offer
6 CONNECTED AREAS36 CAPABILITY CHAPTERS18 EXAMPLE WORKFLOWSSOFTWARE + IMPLEMENTATION FOR UNIVERSITIES
GO AS DEEP AS YOU NEED

Find what you need.

Browse the offer by area, or look up a specific process. Each chapter opens into the details behind it.

36 capability chapters across the university platform
CHAPTER 01

Institution websites

Get a website for your department, faculty or research centre, with people, publications, projects, news and events. We configure and implement it. Your researchers submit updates; your editors approve what goes public.

Explore this area
01Your institution’s branding and languagesYour name, branding, language, contacts, and institutional context shape the site. Start with a focused unit and agree the wider structure as you expand.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Department and faculty identity
  • Polish and English content
  • Institution-specific contacts and navigation
02Researcher and laboratory pagesMake expertise easier to understand through researcher profiles and research-group pages. Connect the person to their publications, projects, teaching, and affiliations.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • People and expertise pages
  • Research groups and lab profiles
  • Connected publications and project records
03Project and publication pagesGive a project space for its actual question, team, work, and outputs. Keep formal funding details available without making them the whole story.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Project descriptions and team links
  • Public output and resource links
  • Publication archives and linked authors
04News, events and teaching contentNews, events, study programmes, and courses belong alongside the research. Editors manage structured content in the same workspace.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • News and author bylines
  • Events and calendar feeds
  • Courses and study programme content
05Researcher updates and editorial approvalResearchers can contribute the information they know best. Review and visibility controls determine what reaches the public site.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Preview before publishing
  • Profile and publication approval
  • Public, internal, and private visibility
06Search and collaboration enquiriesHelp a visitor find expertise or a relevant research group, then give them a clear route to discuss a collaboration.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Search across public research records
  • People and research-group discovery
  • Dedicated collaboration entry points
CHAPTER 02

People & research data

Keep biographies, affiliations, publications and project relationships together. Researchers maintain their information; reviewers check it before it appears on your website or in research discovery.

Explore this area
01Researcher-owned profilesGive people a place to maintain their biography, interests, links, and identifiers, with editorial review before public changes take effect.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Biography and research interests
  • ORCID and useful profile links
  • Field-level visibility and consent
02Publication records that stay usefulConnect ORCID and OpenAlex sources to the institution’s publication work. Imported records can be confirmed, corrected, or reviewed rather than silently treated as perfect.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Publication-source connections
  • Uncertain attribution review
  • Linked department and external authors
03The relationships around the personSee research groups, project involvement, and outputs as connected records. Keep membership and project permissions explicit.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Research-group roles and membership
  • Project and publication relationships
  • Institution and unit context
04A distinction between draft and publicAn internal record can be useful before it is ready for discovery. Preview, approval, and visibility controls keep that distinction clear.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Draft and pending review states
  • Approved public profiles and outputs
  • Private project access controls
05Information with a sourceRetain the connection to an institution’s own records. Public indexing should preserve that ownership rather than merge people simply because their names look alike.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Institution and department attribution
  • Stable source-owned records
  • Controlled public withdrawal and republishing
06A foundation for the next projectUse a clearer research record to discover complementary expertise and put potential collaborators in context.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Researcher and keyword discovery
  • Linked public projects and outputs
  • Potential-partner shortlists
CHAPTER 03

SciMatch research discovery

Describe the research you need in plain language. SciMatch finds relevant researcher profiles and the publications behind them, so you can investigate potential collaborators—even when you do not know their names.

Explore this area
01Researcher search that understands the questionDescribe the research you need in natural language, or search with precise names and technical terms. Automatic mode selects a search approach; semantic and keyword modes give you explicit control.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Automatic, semantic, and keyword search
  • Institution, publication, citation, and career-stage filters
  • Researcher and topic suggestions as you type
02Publications behind the expertiseLook beyond a biography. Review relevant papers alongside search results, then explore a researcher’s publications, abstracts, authorship, and available source links. Publication-search infrastructure also supports title and description queries.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Relevant papers attached to researcher results
  • Profile publications sorted by date or citations
  • Publication search by title, description, year, and citations
03A conversation you can follow back to sourcesAsk a research question, then refine it with a follow-up. The discovery assistant brings retrieved research context into its response and exposes source references you can inspect.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Natural-language discovery and follow-up questions
  • Researcher citations with profile links
  • Source panels and conversation history
04The research landscape, made explorableExplore researchers on an interactive topic-similarity map. Look at clusters, filter the view, inspect a point, and follow nearby expertise across institutional boundaries.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Interactive research maps with zoom and selection
  • Institution colours and advanced filters
  • Related-researcher exploration and institution comparison
05Profiles with reasons to investigateConnect a result to its research interests, affiliations, publication record, and available identifiers. Match explanations show the evidence available behind a result instead of asking you to trust a score alone.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Research interests, affiliations, and source identifiers
  • Matched keywords and related publications
  • Context for relevance, with missing evidence kept explicit
06Start from the document you already haveUse a research proposal, grant application, or reference document as the starting point for discovery. Document analysis extracts topics, builds research queries, and brings matching researchers back for review.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Document upload and topic extraction
  • Visible search queries and linked researcher results
  • Analysis progress and previous-document history
CHAPTER 04

Funding & applications

Find funding calls in Grant Radar, prepare the application with potential partner references, and follow internal approvals in one place. Track the funding decision and hand an awarded grant into a project.

Explore this area
01Funding discovery in contextStart from a Grant Radar call and carry its source details into the institutional application. The catalogue’s maximum support stays distinct from the amount you request.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Call source and revision
  • Programme requirements and deadlines
  • Separate requested funding amount
02Review the fit before relying on itKeep eligibility, consortium conditions, and the project’s actual scope in view. A relevant call is a starting point for review, not a funding commitment.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • University and project eligibility checks
  • Partner and consortium requirements
  • Explicit review of unknown conditions
03Search for the missing expertiseUse an explicit research topic to search UNITE and save potential partner references alongside the application. Confirm collaboration separately.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • User-initiated researcher search
  • Potential-partner shortlists
  • Public references kept with the request
04Internal approval with a clear trailRoute the application through the institution’s reviewed process. Keep forms, revisions, decisions, and responsibilities close to the same request.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Institutional approval paths
  • Return for changes and decision history
  • Clear current step and reviewer
05Track the external decisionRecord submission evidence and the actual funding outcome. A reviewed award has its own amount and evidence before it is handed into project work.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • External submission receipt
  • Awarded, unfunded, or withdrawn outcomes
  • Award documents and separate review
06Move the award into deliveryCreate or confirm a linked project after award review. Carry the approved funding context forward without recreating the application in a second lifecycle.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Reviewed award-to-project handoff
  • Project and funding-register links
  • Quarterly reporting and final review
CHAPTER 05

Projects & reporting

Give staff one place for project records, purchase and travel requests, approvals and progress reports. Keep each request with its research and funding context, so the next decision does not get lost in email.

Explore this area
01A project with its context intactCarry a reviewed award into the existing institutional project record. Keep its funder, project relationships, and related grant accessible to authorised people.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Project description, stage, and people
  • Permission-aware grant connection
  • Internal project before public publication
02Planned work and responsibilitiesBring planned research activity and supporting tasks into the institution’s workspace. Make the next action and the person responsible visible.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Planned research activities
  • Owners, status, and next steps
  • Task-focused action and waiting lanes
03Purchases connected to the workPrepare a purchase request with its specification, justification, funding source, and attachments. Retain the review decision and the next administrative step.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Structured purchase requests
  • Funding-source references
  • Review and request history
04Travel with a useful planConnect research travel to its purpose, itinerary, costs, funding sources, and approvals. Keep a readable summary available to the people reviewing it.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Trip and conference planning
  • Cost lines and funding sources
  • Institutional travel approval
05Publications and outputsLink publication planning and the actual approved output to the research. Public publication remains an explicit editorial decision.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Draft and planned publication context
  • Authors, groups, and project links
  • Approved public research outputs
06Reporting with continuityKeep quarterly reports and final review in the grant lifecycle, with the project connection and decision trail available as the work develops.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Quarterly reporting stages
  • Progress and final review
  • Persistent workflow and decision history
CHAPTER 06

Industry & collaboration

Help researchers find collaborators beyond their own institution. Scindu also brings business technology challenges to relevant university experts and helps scope the team, funding route and project.

Explore this area
01A visible picture of expertiseHelp prospective collaborators understand researchers through their public interests, projects, groups, and approved publications.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Public researcher profiles
  • Connected project and output records
  • Institution and department attribution
02Discovery beyond one websiteInstitution-approved public records can feed UNITE researcher discovery. Keep each publisher’s ownership and attribution rather than treating the index as the institution’s private workspace.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Researcher and keyword search
  • Public institution filters
  • Source-owned public record links
03Potential partners in contextSave relevant researcher references alongside a grant application. Treat the shortlist as a set of people to approach, with actual participation still to be agreed.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Application-linked partner shortlist
  • Public research context
  • Explicit team and access confirmation
04A route for business challengesCompanies bring a technical uncertainty. Scindu’s commercial engagement explores the expertise, funding route, and collaboration structure that could move the work forward.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Business research brief
  • Relevant university capabilities
  • Funding and project-structure exploration
05Publication remains a choiceCurate what the institution shares. Private proposals, internal decisions, and award evidence do not become public just because a profile is discoverable.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Approved public projections
  • Private workspace boundaries
  • Withdrawal and stable republishing
06An institutional foundation for partnershipsA useful public presence and maintained research records help a partnership start with clearer context. The university offer builds that foundation before the introduction.
WHAT THIS INCLUDES
  • Institution websites and profiles
  • Current research and output context
  • Connected grant and project lifecycle
THE NEXT LAYER

Room to go further.

PROPOSED ADDITIONS

Ideas for the next version of the platform. These are proposals for development, separate from the offer above.

Institution websites2 proposals
PROPOSED

Institution-wide content health

Spot stale profiles, missing project summaries, and broken output links before a visitor does.

PROPOSED

A coordinated faculty presence

Give several departments shared publishing patterns while preserving their own identity and editorial responsibility.

People & research data2 proposals
PROPOSED

Capability and facility profiles

Describe methods, equipment, specialist facilities, and technology readiness alongside research interests.

PROPOSED

Collaboration availability

Let researchers express current interests, capacity, and willingness to join a new project without implying consent from a search result.

SciMatch research discovery3 proposals
PROPOSED

Shared discovery workspaces

Keep a team’s searches, annotated researcher shortlists, and publication evidence together, with permissions and a clear handoff into a grant application.

PROPOSED

Research watches

Follow a research question and review new publications, emerging expertise, or relevant institutional updates as the evidence changes.

PROPOSED

A publication-first discovery workspace

Bring the existing publication-search infrastructure into a dedicated browsing experience that connects papers, research questions, authors, and project opportunities.

Funding & applications3 proposals
PROPOSED

Grant readiness workspace

An actionable checklist of eligibility questions, required evidence, partner contributions, and application blockers.

PROPOSED

Consortium completion

Identify missing disciplines and partner roles, then coordinate interest, consent, and confirmed participation.

PROPOSED

Funding-pipeline portfolio

Give authorised research-office staff a cross-project view of opportunities, submissions, decisions, and bottlenecks.

Projects & reporting3 proposals
PROPOSED

Evidence-backed reporting packs

Assemble editable report drafts from approved progress updates, publications, and activity records, with links back to the evidence.

PROPOSED

Budget and effort planning

Connect project allocations, partner contributions, commitments, and effort estimates beyond the existing funding-source register.

PROPOSED

Research-office portfolio

A permissioned view across project milestones, reporting deadlines, and stalled approvals for the teams overseeing delivery.

Industry & collaboration3 proposals
PROPOSED

Institutional collaboration inbox

Route qualified company briefs to the right institutional coordinators, with separate handling for confidential business information.

PROPOSED

Confirmed consortium workspace

Coordinate invitations, researcher interest, availability, responsibilities, and explicit participation across institutions.

PROPOSED

Collaboration setup checklist

Keep IP expectations, confidentiality, publication constraints, and agreement status visible before research begins.

16 PROPOSALS ACROSS THE PLATFORMPRIORITIES SHAPED WITH PARTICIPATING INSTITUTIONS
ONE USEFUL STARTING POINT

You don’t need to
start with everything.

Start with a department, faculty, or research centre. Bring the most useful processes together first, then connect the next part of the institution.

THE UNIVERSITY OFFERSoftware.
Implementation.
A connected foundation.

Software and implementation are free for universities. We agree the research-data scope, visibility, institutional responsibilities, and rollout before onboarding.

How the university partnership works
THE BEGINNING OF WHAT’S NEXT

A better foundation
for your institution.

Outline your institution, the systems you use, and the work you’d like to connect. Start with one unit or a wider rollout.

This creates a local brief. No personal data is sent, and no enquiry is submitted.